| Ecuador's Yasuni Park: Oil Exploration or Nature Protection? |
|
|
| Tuesday, 25 March 2008 | |
|
Corpwatch Manuela Omari Ima, a Waorani woman from the Ecuadorian Amazon, was
born in the Yasuni National Park, a 2.5 million acre primary tropical
rainforest at the intersection of the Andes, the Amazon and the
Equator. That intersection is also the heart of a struggle between two
plans: one for oil exploration and another that would permanently
protect one of the most biologically diverse regions of the planet.
Cartoon by Khalil Bendib, Corpwatch
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO) declared Yasuni a biosphere reserve in 1989, after biologists
found that a mere 2.5 acres of this forest contained as many tree
species as in the United States and Canada combined. It is also home to
jaguars, woolly and spider monkeys, and harpy eagles -- the most
powerful bird of prey in the world. Some of the species in Yasuni,
however, live on the brink of extinction: including more than 20
globally threatened mammal species such as the white-bellied spider
monkey and the rare golden-mantled tamarin.
Armed with these new contracts from Quito, Ecuador’s capital, the
companies have attempted to win over the people of the forest. Alicia
Cahuiya, another Waorani woman who lives in the town of Pujo, says the
companies offered the indigenous villagers items such as soccer
clothes and candy in return for permission to drill for oil on their
land.
Local Complaints
The company disagrees. One of Skanska’s regional managers in the Amazon basin is Milton Diaz, an Argentinian oil exploration veteran who has worked in the industry for many decades. He dismisses the complaints: “People here in the bush should be grateful to industry instead of just complaining and making unreasonable demands,” he says. Private Security Diaz also says that the indigenous people are a threat to Skanska. “People here are slightly backward. You never know when the barbarians are going to start shooting arrows from the bushes. At Skanska, we also have a strict security culture. Personally, I never go unarmed in the bush.” The Skanska engineeers pay for armed private security guards, but the company also has an agreement with the military for support under a special security council set up by the government of Ecuador in January 2006 called GESPETRO - Grupo Especial de Seguridad Petrolera (Special Group on Oil Security). GESPETRO is charged with coordinating security for the companies involved with oil extraction such as Petrobras. The contracts include stipulations that the oil companies are to supply the military with infrastructure, food, fuel, living quarters and emergency medical care in exchange for protection. Similarly, the companies are obligated under the contracts to inform the Napo military base of community projects and programs that the company provides to the civilian population. Alicia Cahuiya says that effectively the land belonging to her people in Yasuni has now been occupied by the companies’ oil fields and the military: “Every step we take is watched, and if we voice a protest, Repsol turns the military on us,” she says. “If we do not comply, they threaten or beat us. There have even been cases where the military have killed Waorani people and thrown the bodies in the rivers.” Attorney Bolivar Beltran, from Fundación Lianas, says that the contract violates Chapter V of Ecuador’s constitution, as well as the UN Convention on the Rights of Indigenous and Tribal People. Both assure indigenous peoples a set of cultural and self-determination rights, such as the right to be part of all decision-making on issues concerning their lands. Standard Practice? Pablo Fajardo, a lawyer for the Ecuadorian network Frente de Defensa de la Amazonia (FDA), says that this is standard practice. “The population is being exposed to serious health hazards and illness related to oil spills and deliberate waste dumping while they often live in fear of the companies, whose power is expressed through threats and violence,” he says. “By using armed private forces, the companies try to control and stifle local resistance at any price. This is what it’s like in the entire region, and all companies working with oil are forced to deal with this reality.” Back in Sweden, Noel Morrin, Skanska’s sustainability manager at the company headquarters in Stockholm, claims that the company is not breaking laws or violating its own ethical code of conduct. But some Skanska officials say that they are concerned about the allegations in Ecuador. Peter Gimbe, the senior vice president for communications in Stockholm, says that headquarters has little insight into local conditions and that they are investigating the complaints. An Uncertain Future Today the future of the ITT fields remain uncertain. The new government of Rafael Correa initially considered the possibility of creating a consortium with Ecuadorean state-owned oil companies to develop the ITT fields. Venezuela’s state oil firm PDVSA and Argentina’s Enarsa expressed interest in taking part in any future consortium. In May 2007 Correa put forward an innovative idea: his government would refrain from exploiting Yasuni in exchange for receiving at least $350 million annually from the international community. The idea was promoted heavily by the government, with vice-president Lenin Moreno Garces staging an event during the Live Earth concert last year. TV cameras broadcast him joining nearly 100 people to spell out the words “Live Yasuni” from a forest clearing. Organizations like the Wallace Global Fund have committed $100,000 to the initiative. A number of other groups including Acción Ecológica, Amazon Watch, Earth Economics, University of Maryland, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, Pachamama Alliance, and World Resources Institute, have put their weight behind it as well, but the plan has yet to get firm commitments for the full sum of money.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|

